Global change (climate change)

Scientific conclusions unmistakably point out that we are in an anthropogenic climate change which has negative effects on the diversity of the world's fauna and flora. Subsequently, they suggest preventing the world from further increases or even possible accelerations of climate change is not a too crazy idea.

Sadly enough, the debate about climate change has become the victim of pollution itself because there are many peoples or organisations who gain benefits if they can dempen or even contradict the conclusions of climate science. How this debate is being polluted you can read on this blog: http://jules-klimaat.blogspot.com .

Unwanting to discuss hard empircally based conclusions of the scientifical world but also avoiding a dogmatic vision, I would be gratified if people who deny the truthness of climate change provide me (and the academical world) with a peer-reviewed paper (*), which contradicts the present conclusions of climate science.

(*) Evidently, not funded by or related in any way to people or organisations that have proven to try frauding science or have particulair interests in changing the way the public and policemakers think about global change.